Lot 272 (The Winter Country House Sale, 5th December 2017)

‘Shah Jahan in the Time of Youth’ ascribed to Govardhan India

‘Shah Jahan in the Time of Youth’ ascribed to Govardhan
India, Mughal, c.1630-1640
opaque watercolour with gold on paper, inscribed at lower left '…dhan' (the second half of [Govar]dhan), inner blue border, outer gold-flecked cream border, inscribed Imperial Mughal albums from the Chester Beatty Library, Alexandria VA, 2008, nos. 39, 41, 44, pp. 302-303, 310-311, 322-323); two ladies on a daybed (Seitz Collection, see J Seyller, 'Mughal and Deccani Paintings', Zurich, 2010, no. 11, p. 55); a prince and consort (probably Jahangir and Nur Jahan) embracing on a terrace (Los Angeles County Museum of Art, see P Pal, 'Indian Painting', Los Angeles, 1993, no.71, pp. 259-261); a portrait of Jabha (see J Seyller, ‘Govardhan’, in Beach, Fischer and Goswamy, 'Masters of Indian Painting 1100-1650', Artibus Asiae Suppl. 48-1, Zurich, 2011, p. 369, fig. 13).

In terms of the general style and subject matter, there are several further works of the 1630s and 1640s that relate to the present painting, including a scene of Jahangir with Sultan Khurram and Nur Jahan (Freer Gallery of Art, Washington DC., see M Beach, 'The Imperial Image, Paintings for the Mughal Court', Washington, 2012, no. 35, pp. 162-3); a series of illustrations in a manuscript of the Khamsa of Nizami of c.1640 (Khalili Collection, London, see L. Leach, 'Paintings from India', London, 1998, no. 30, pp. 84, 100-101, 104); a scene of royal lovers on a terrace (see S C Welch, 'Imperial Mughal Painting', London, 1978, pl. 35, pp. 108-109).

The painter Govardhan, one of the greatest imperial artists of the Mughal period, was son of the royal artist Bhawani Das and was born at court. He began work in the royal atelier at the end of Akbar’s reign in the last years of the sixteenth century and continued through Jahangir’s reign and most of Shah Jahan’s, until about 1645. His mature works show a strong interest in portraiture and a penetrating psychological insight. His favourite themes were scenes of holy men and intimate scenes of princes and their consorts, such as the present work. For further discussion of his style and illustrations of his work see M Beach, 'The Grand Mogul: Imperial Painting in India, 1600-1660', Williamstown MA, 1978, pp.118-125; M Beach in Das et al., 'Mughal Masters: Further Studies', Marg, Mumbai, 1998, pp.134-145; L. Leach, 'Mughal and Other Indian Paintings from the Chester Beatty Library', Dublin, 1995, vol. II, pp. 1103-1104; A. Okada, 'Indian Miniatures of the Mughal Court', New York, 1992, pp. 185-205; J Seyller in Beach, Fischer and Goswamy 2011, pp. 357-374.

Shah Jahan, Mughal emperor from 1628 to 1658, was a great patron of the arts. His most famous commission was the Taj Mahal, in the lower border 'shabihi shah jahan dar ‘alam juwani ‘amal-i govardhan', 'a picture of Shah Jahan in the time of youth the work of Govardhan'; reverse with a letter dated 1846 relating to the provenance (see below)
miniature: 23.8 x built to house the tomb of his beloved wife Mumtaz Mahal, who died in 1631, but his reign also produced a flowering of other arts such as painting, textiles and jewellery. The lack of facial hair on the male figure in the present work indicates an age of perhaps fourteen to sixteen years. If the figure does indeed represent Shah Jahan, who was born in 1592, the scene may represent his engagement to Mumtaz Mahal (Arjumand Banu Begam) which occurred in 1607-8 when he was fifteen (they were married five years later in 1612). The style of the painting indicates a date of production of about 1630 to 1640, and it is conceivable that this painting was produced for Shah Jahan in the aftermath of Mumtaz Mahal’s death in 1631 as a retrospective celebration of their loving union.

The hexagonal dais on which the royal couple sit in the present work is unusual, as is the shape of the carpet surrounding it, but it is interesting to note a Mughal carpet fragment of c.1650 of similar shape in the Cincinnati Art Museum (see D Walker, 'Flowers Underfoot, Indian Carpets of the Mughal era', New York, 1997, figs. 101-103, pp. 104-105). The rectangular carpet in the background of the chamber in this painting can be compared to several other mid-seventeenth century Mughal carpets (ibid, figs. 104, 111-114).

The provenance of this work is important and highly interesting. A letter written in a flowing early nineteenth century English hand is pasted to the back of the frame. The letter is from Robert Emlyn Lofft to an acquaintance of the owner of the painting and is dated 18th July 1846. In it he describes the painting and gives his interpretation of the inscription in the lower border, as well as the opinion of H H Wilson, a prominent Sanskrit scholar and the librarian at East India House in London. Frustratingly, what is not apparent is to whom the letter is written, nor who the owner was in 1846 - the letter is addressed simply 'Sir…'. The final sentence of the letter: 'Hoping that these explanations may be of use to the owner of the picture, who I believe is desirous to dispose of it' indicates that it may have changed hands soon after 1846.

The transcription on the reverse reads:

Troston near Ixworth 18th July 1846
I have the pleasure to send you a copy of a note from the Librarian at the East India House to whom I sent a copy of the inscription on the picture I saw at your house.
Library E I House [East India House] 14.2cm
visible area: 29.5 x 19.5cm

In the possession of an East Anglian collector, probably in or near Bury St. Edmunds, before 1846. A handwritten letter from R E Lofft dated 18th July 1846 describing the painting and giving 17 July
The inscription on your picture signifies 'The Portrait of Shahjehan in the time of his youth, the work (or painting) of the painter Goverdhan.' The last word is the name of the Hindu Artist.
Yours truly,
H. H. Wilson
My interpretation was 'Portrait of Shahjehan in the world of youth, the work of Hour Dehan.' The Persian word which interpreted literally world, Mr Wilson has rendered by the word time by a freer translation, and the name of the Hindu artist he has written - Goverdham - I do not doubt more correctly he being a Hindu scholar and my knowledge being confined to Persian. This is all the difference in our translations.
Shahjehan was one of the Moghul Emperors of Hindostan and reigned about the middle of the 17th century.
By his order was built the splendid mausoleum, called the Tah-mehal, near Agra, for the sepulchre of his favourite Queen. It is considered one of the wonders of the world, but whether the lady in the Picture is intended for that Queen, there is nothing in the inscription to denote. I consider the picture to be a good one of the kind. It may be of the date of that Emperor or of not much more recent date.
Hoping that these explanations may be of use to the owner of the picture, who I believe is desirous to dispose of it.
I am
Sir, Yours truly,
R E Lofft

Robert Emlyn Lofft (1782-1847) was born at Troston Hall near Bury St. Edmunds in Suffolk. He joined the Bengal Army in 1803 and transferred to the Native Infantry in 1806. He served as an interpreter, Quartermaster, instructor and Brevet Captain and retired in 1820. He collected Arabic and Persian manuscripts, and after his death several were donated by his son to Cambridge University Library.

Horace Hayman Wilson (1786-1860) was one of the most prominent early scholars on Indian language and literature. He went to India with the East India Company in 1808 having studied medicine in London and was appointed Secretary to the Asiatic Society of Bengal in 1811, Boden professor of Sanskrit at Oxford in 1832 and librarian to the East India Company in 1836. In 1813 he published the first English translation of the Sanskrit text of Kalidasa’s Meghaduta, and in 1819 he completed an influential Sanskrit-English dictionary. He published many further translations from Sanskrit as well as works on history, Indian medicine and catalogues of Oriental manuscripts.

We are grateful to Marcus Fraser for writing this interpretations of the inscription is pasted to the reverse of the frame.

This is an important and rare painting of a Mughal prince seated with his consort in a palace chamber. There is a later inscription in the lower border describing the scene catalogue entry.
as 'a picture of Shah Jahan in the time of youth…' and naming the artist as Govardhan, one of the leading Mughal royal painters of the first half of the seventeenth century. This attribution is apparently confirmed by a short inscription at the lower left of the painted area which reads '…dhan' - the second half of the name Govardhan. It is not clear why only the final letters of the name survive in this inscription, but it may simply be due to localised loss of pigment and subsequent retouching, of which there is evidence at the lower left corner.

The style of the painting is very close to Govardhan’s, in particular the subdued, brownish palette, the precisely drawn facial features of the two figures, the romance and palpable intimacy of the scene, and the candid gaze that the princess directs outwards towards the viewer. There are several works signed by or attributed to Govardhan that provide comparisons, of which the following are the most relevant: a scene of a prince (possibly Parviz) and his consort on a terrace, a scene of Jahangir celebrating Holi in the women’s quarters, and a scene of a gathering of princes in a garden (all three in the Chester Beatty Library, Dublin, see E Wright, Muraqqa’,

Sold for £42,000

Condition report
Condition Report Updated 28 November 2017:
Overall size approximately 20cm x 44cm x 30.7cm.
The original miniature has been executed on handmade laid paper, using a combination of watercolour, gouache and gold powder in a medium. The Loveday November 2017

Not viewed out of the frame.
We highly recommend viewing in person.
Tears/losses to the right hand corner.
There are cracks to the thicker areas of paint, minor rippling of the paper.
Staining throughout the edge.
The back inscription has area of loss where the hook has worn it off.
Staining down left side, tears again to both sides.
inscription to the bottom left is executed in ink.
The miniature was received in a sealed frame, to the back of which was a handwritten letter from R.E. Lofft, dated 1846, giving a description of the miniature, together with an interpretation of the inscription at its lower left hand corner. In order to remove the miniature from the frame it has been necessary to lift the letter from the outer margins of the frame, whilst still adhered to the backing board. The letter is in an extremely degraded state, and requires specific conservation in order to remove it from the backing board, and to preserve it thereafter.
When released from the frame, it was discovered that the miniature was itself adhered to the backing board, with a single paper interface between the two. As a result of the latter, it was possible to separate the two without damage to the original. It is probable that a secondary paper substrate is adhered to the miniature, but its removal is not recommended due to the potential risk of damage to the pigment layers of the original.

The miniature is presented and adhered within a ruled, decorated and illuminated paper frame. There is some separation of the two as seen on the verso.

The miniature itself is in a stable condition. There is general scuffing and abrasion of the pigments’ surface to a degree that is commensurate with its age, but in general there is no actual lifting of the layers. Splitting of the original paper is however clearly seen along the lower edge of the miniature, at its interface with its decorated paper frame. Here there is clear loss to the pigment layers, with retouching apparent at both corners. Beyond these areas there would appear to be no retouching within the image.

Minor creasing of the original paper is present across the miniature which further points to its adhesion onto a secondary paper backing. Size overall 20.4 x 30.7cm

Condition Report by Helen


Due to the current restrictions on auction houses we are offering a revised range of bidding options for our Live Online Auctions and Online Only Timed Auctions, please see below.


Absentee bidding

As you cannot attend the auction in person we can bid on your behalf. You can leave an absentee bid on our website.

The amount you bid should be your maximum bid. We will bid up to that limit for you, and remember you may end up paying less than your limit, depending on other bidding on the day.

You can leave an absentee bid up to half an hour before the start of any sale. Please note when we receive two or more absentee bids for the same amount, the first bid received will be the one taken.

Leave commission bids online on sworder.co.uk

If you would like to leave a commission bid on our website you can do so up until 30 minutes before the sale starts. Leaving a commission bid through sworder.co.uk is free for all registered clients. Thereafter you may register bank card details under your account in order to bid live. Click here to register an account.

Bid live on sworder.co.uk

You can bid live at our auctions from the comfort of your home or office using bidding platform Sworders Live.  It is easy to register and you can watch the auction live as it happens.  A 'Bid Live' button will appear on the auction on our website homepage when a sale is live; simply click the button to sign in or register with your card details. There is no additional charge for this service. 

For further instructions on registering to bid live, please click here.

Telephone bidding

If you would like to bid by telephone please contact our team prior to the auction with your details of the lots you are interested in and your full name, address, telephone number(s) and email address. Once our team have entered your bid request you will receive an email confirmation. We will contact you during the sale and one of our team will bid live with you over the phone.

Please note that we normally offer this service for lots with an estimate of £500 or higher and all telephone bid requests must be received by close of business the day before the auction.


New users will need a Sworders online account in order to bid in our Timed Auctions.

Create an account

Once logged in you will be able to see the current bidding that lot has reached, together with our guide estimates of its value.  The value you bid excludes buyer’s premium of 30% (including VAT) which will be paid in addition, except for our Fine Wine and Port auctions when it is 18% (including VAT).

When you have placed a bid you will be receive a confirmation email. If you are outbid at any point you will receive a subsequent email notifying you, giving you the chance to increase your bid amount.

For more information about bidding in an online only auction please click here.

The auction details are as follows:

Auction: The Winter Country House Sale, 5th December 2017

1 December 2017 9am - 5pm
2 December 2017 10am - 4pm
3 December 2017 10am - 1pm
4 December 2017 9am - 5pm
5 December 2017 from 9am

View all lots in this sale

For jewellery, coins and some luxury goods we are able to provide you with a pack and send option for small items with an auction value of less than £2,500 and where the total weight of the package is below 2kg. 

The cost is: 

Total weight package less than 1kg £15

Total weight package from 1kg - 2kg £20

If you would like to take advantage of this service please do let us know.  

For all other collection and delivery services, please refer to our shipping page for more information.

Click here for more details

Here at Sworders we are happy to offer a free online valuation service. Please fill out the form and press the 'Submit' button below.

To help us with your valuation please attach clear photographs of the item where possible. You can submit up to 5.

Approximate dimensions are also useful. Expect to hear from the appropriate valuer as soon as possible.

Images Add file
Select fileChange Remove